Lawyer Criticizes Soludo’s Ban on Public Preaching & N500,000 Fine

A recent decision by Anambra State Governor Chukwuma Soludo to ban public preaching in markets has sparked controversy, with a human rights lawyer criticizing the move as an overreach that threatens religious freedom.

The ban, which includes a fine of N500,000 for violators, was justified by Soludo as necessary to combat noise pollution. However, Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor, counsel for the Indigenous People of Biafra, argues that the measure infringes upon constitutional guarantees of religious freedom.

Ejiofor suggests that instead of an outright ban, the governor should have explored ways to regulate public preaching to mitigate noise pollution. He references the 1999 Constitution, which protects the right to manifest and propagate one's religion in public or private settings. The Supreme Court has also upheld these rights, emphasizing the freedom to spread religious beliefs as part of worship and practice.

Critics argue that the ban criminalizes public religious activities, including crusades and outreaches, under a vaguely defined law. They contend that Soludo's approach fails to address more pressing issues in Anambra, such as insecurity, and instead undermines fundamental freedoms. Neighboring states like Abia and Enugu are cited as examples of effective governance that respects religious liberties.

Ejiofor urges the governor to reconsider the ban, emphasizing that true leadership involves building and securing communities rather than suppressing freedom.